The CTV Building in Christchurch, Collapse During the Earthquake of Assignment

The CTV structure in Christchurch, Collapse During the Earthquake of That Date - Assignment ExampleHence it gave rise to such circumstances. A number of defects relating to the design had been identified which had led to this collapse. The construction of any structure requires technical knowhow relating to architecture and along with that precision. Construction Manager Along with the chief engineer, the manager of the entire process is equally responsible. Management of an architectural protrusion requires technical knowledge along with practical experience. A person who lacks such skills should not begin such large scale purposes. A little deeper encounter with the entire issue reveals the fact that thither was lack in ripe strategy formulation, planning, implementation and maintenance which ar essential for any project to be successful. Architect of the building Post seism records revealed the fact that there were flaws in the entire innovation of the building (Fur and De utsche, 2007, p.11). The asymmetric design was the reason why the building collapsed so easily. A proper earthquake resistant building must have the roofs and floor slabs in the horizontal planes. The columns and beams should have been properly friction matching ensuring strength of the building. Operations Manager This person is responsible for the selection of the materials which are necessary for the construction. The materials should be jerk resistant in order to be categorized as safe materials. The safety level of the building would depend on the selection of the materials. The building safety and lives of people would be at stake if they are not protected against the tremors of an earthquake in an earthquake prone zone. Junior Engineers The junior engineers who were responsible for the project were not capable. They were sent for approval of the project.... The report analyses the reasons and the people involved in the process. It finds out that if these people had been a little more careful this state of affairs could have been avoided. The engineers on their part had approved projects that were not viable. It butt end also be concluded that onwards the project was undertaken there was lack of strict vigilance and the proper process of project approval was not undertaken. There were flaws in selection of the team members, the team of engineers, the materials supplied failed to match up with the standards and the improper execution of the constructions mechanisms can be cited as the reasons behind the collapse. The safety standards were not followed in spite the building falling within an earthquake prone area. The regular checks of the vigilance team and from the government activity were not undertaken and so there was no one to clear the doubt situation. Although the building had good policy coverage the people working inside the building were not trained with adequate training which may come in handy in situations of disasters. The above ment ioned key role players could have prevented the entire situation only provided each party did their work diligently. Here we can see that there is negligence and slue among all the key role players which collectively contributed to the occurrence of the building devastation. Proper audit and investigation before the occurrence of the incident would have stopped it from happening and saved more lives.